Baku/02.02.22/Turan: Recently, there have been reports in the media that users of social networks and journalists are summoned to the Prosecutor General's Office, warned, prosecuted, fined and sentenced to administrative arrests. A group of social network users faced the same situation on January 24. On the same day, the Prosecutor General's Office reported that social media users Mirzali Yalchin Yashar oglu Huseynov Ilham Telman, Abbasli Nizami Asadulla oglu Isaev Afgan Anvar oglu and Azadov Rasim Alif oglu were warned in accordance with Article 21 of the Law on the Prosecutor's Office. These people have been warned for sharing on social media.
At the same time, journalist Sahavat Mammad and Jamaz.info editor Fikret Faramazoglu were fined 500 manats each. On February 3, the Nasimi District Court will consider the claim of the Prosecutor General's Office against Azermedia LLC.
What is going on? Does the Prosecutor General's Office act as a "censor"?
Khalid Agaliyev, head of the media rights group, answers these and other questions in the “Difficult Question” program.
According to him, over the past 2 months, 20 social activists, social network users and journalists were invited to the General Prosecutor's Office, where they were warned about the inadmissibility of their thoughts.
“Many of them were charged with an administrative offense and sent to the courts. Most of the cases sent to the courts are cases against journalists. The courts ruled to fine these journalists, and one of them was placed under administrative arrest. This is the general picture,” Agaliyev said.
According to the expert, from the point of view of domestic justice, the prosecutor's office is endowed with such a right. “If the prosecutor's office, after conducting an investigation, finds nuances in the disseminated information that threaten public safety, i.e. calls that incite hatred or enmity, calls for violence, then it can invite people making such calls and warn them in this regard,” Agaliev said, adding that in 2017 the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Information, Informatization and Information Protection" has been amended to restrict freedom of expression. Later, in accordance with these changes, changes were made to the Code of Administrative Offenses. In a word, the national legislation allows to restrict fundamental freedoms.
“The purpose of such interventions is to intimidate, to silence,” the expert concluded.--0--
Difficult question
-
The municipal elections in Azerbaijan, held on January 29, took place without significant public interest or pre-election activity, according to an election law expert. Official data from the Central Election Commission (CEC) reported a voter turnout of 31.45%, but independent observers have cast doubt on this figure.
-
The absence of Azerbaijan's delegation at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) winter session has sparked questions about the country’s participation in the European institution. According to sources in Azerbaijan's parliament, PACE did not send an official invitation to Azerbaijan, as participation requires such an invitation to be issued.
-
Azerbaijani pro-government media have unleashed an unexpected wave of anti-Russian rhetoric, including claims of espionage at the "Russian House" and accusations that the opposition National Council has ties with Moscow. Chairman of the National Council of Democratic Forces Jamil Hasanli dismissed the allegations as baseless, describing them as part of a smear campaign by the government to shift attention from its own close ties with the Kremlin.
-
In the wake of Donald Trump’s return to the White House, questions about his administration’s foreign policy direction loom large, particularly regarding its approach to the South Caucasus. Speaking on the "Difficult Question" program from Washington, Azerbaijani journalist Alex Raufoglu gave a subtle assessment of how the Trump presidency could affect relations between the United States and Azerbaijan.
Leave a review