Vadim Dubnov, Radio Liberty columnist, Caucasus expert
Abstracts of Ilham Aliyev's last interview and Yerevan's reaction
In a recent exchange, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed deep concern over what he perceives as a significant setback to the peace process, citing recent statements from Azerbaijan. Pashinyan asserted that Baku is reneging on previous agreements regarding the recognition of territorial integrity based on the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1991, which played a crucial role in the formation of independent states following the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Pashinyan emphasized that border delimitation should not entail creating new borders but restoring those that existed at the time of the Alma-Ata Declaration. He accused Azerbaijan of making territorial claims against Armenia, deeming it "absolutely unacceptable" and suggested that some external and internal forces might be hindering the peace treaty between the two nations.
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, in a January 10 interview, outlined his stance on the peace treaty, emphasizing the need for a bilateral format without the involvement of external guarantors. Aliyev underscored that the issue is between the two countries, and they must resolve it independently. He added that Azerbaijan's relations with Armenia should not become a geopolitical topic, asserting that both options of continuing or halting negotiations are possible.
Addressing the delimitation and demarcation of borders, Aliyev rejected using maps from 1975, arguing that Armenian-proposed delimitation based on these maps overlooks Azerbaijan's territorial losses after Sovietization. He stated that Azerbaijan would not move from positions occupied in May 2021 and September 2022 until the border is determined. Aliyev accused Armenia of continuing to occupy Azerbaijani villages, asserting that this issue needs clarification during upcoming commission meetings.
Regarding the unblocking of transport links, Aliyev dismissed Armenia's proposed router, emphasizing its impracticality due to harsh weather conditions. He insisted on using the Meghri corridor and warned that unless the specified route is opened, Azerbaijan will not consider opening the border with Armenia elsewhere.
Vadim Dubnov, a columnist for Radio Liberty and Caucasus expert, analyzed the situation, suggesting that while Aliyev's statements formally appear to be a blow to the peace treaty, they are primarily aimed at exerting pressure and signaling a shift in Azerbaijan's stance on communications. Dubnov interpreted Aliyev's remarks as a declaration, emphasizing that Azerbaijan may not be ready to pursue military or other actions to enforce its claims. The expert underscored the importance of communication issues as a focal point in the current tensions between the two nations.
Leave a review
Difficult question
-
Next year, the minimum wage in Azerbaijan will be 400 manat. This is reflected in the conclusion of the Accounting Chamber on the draft law "On the State Budget of the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2025." In 2024, the minimum wage was 345 manat.
-
Türkiyə Prezidenti Rəcəb Tayyib Ərdoğan İsraillə ticarət əlaqələrini kəsdiklərini deyib.
-
The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is currently underway in Baku, having started on November 11 and scheduled to continue until November 22. Meanwhile, international organizations are stepping up their calls concerning human rights violations in Azerbaijan.
-
What led to Donald Trump's re-election as U.S. President? How will his administration impact relations between the two countries? What role will human rights and democracy issues in Azerbaijan play in U.S. policy?
7 comment
Gagik
2024-01-16
Ne nado lya-lya , Aliev govoril yasno i pod vliyaniem putina. Kado bilo nachinat s etim a ne iskat absurdnie obyasnenie zayavleniyam
Элиш
2024-01-16
Ошибка Азербайджанского правительства АДР в 1918 году это создание на азербайджанских землях искусственного государства Армения и в виде подарка подарили Эривань.Надо было всех дашнаков депортировать в Иран, откуда они и пришли.
Эл
2024-01-17
Cavad, а кто вам сказал , что армчне пришли из Ирана?! Тем более , что государства Иран не было , его придумали британцы в середине 20 века на исторических знемлях Сефевидов. А армяне вообще были присланы из Индии. Британцы любили во время войны исполььзовать легионеров из заморских территорий ,чтоб воевать с Османской Империей, До 20 века термина армчнин вообще не существовало, пока французы не придумали сказку с резней!
Gagik
2024-01-16
Elisg kto tvoy uchitel po istoriy?
Gagik
2024-01-18
El ti prevzashol so svoimi neznaniyami Elisha. Chto tam uchat u vas smeshno. Britanci napravili armyanskiy desant iz Indiy i oni parashutami spustilis na Kavkaz, bravo(((
Эл
2024-01-18
Гагик , а парашюты были древние армянские парашюты😁 Смешно, когда половина т.н. Ирана состоит из Азербайджанцев , а персы отрицают существование Азербайджана. Смешно ,когда армяне переводят топонимы с тюркского на армянский типа Нахчыван на " Нахиджеван" , Шуша на " Шуши", Иряван на " Ереван" ( хотя даже русские захватчики называли его " Эривань". Смешно когда персы доказывают арабам , что они самые настоящие мусульмане и при этом молятся на арабском. И печально , что армяне не хотят признать то что алфавит не армянский , аэфиорский. Мы ведь не рассказывем ,что латинский алфавит придумали азербайджанцы... Печально когда древняя христианская нация , которая приняла христианство до ...РОЖДЕСТВА ХРИСТОВА, печет и готовит мусульманские блюда , утвердждая что это их национальная кухня.
Gagik
2024-01-19
El ti govoril vsyo no ni o cyom