The election is over. What's next?
The dust has settled after Azerbaijan's early presidential elections on February 7, with Ilham Aliyev clinching victory, securing his fifth term in office over the next seven years. The swift announcement of these elections, catching the opposition off guard, virtually assured Aliyev's triumph, leaving little room for doubt among observers.
The rationale behind Aliyev's decision to hold snap elections, given his widespread popularity following the resolution of the Karabakh conflict, raises pertinent questions about his motives and the message he intends to convey. To delve into these intricacies, political commentator Zardusht Alizadeh offers insights in the program "Difficult Question."
Alizadeh posits various theories to explain Aliyev's strategic calculus. Notably, he suggests that Aliyev may have sought to preempt potential obstacles posed by external factors, particularly the Russian dimension. In light of past electoral challenges stemming from the "Putin factor," Aliyev may have aimed to neutralize any interference from Russia by capitalizing on distractions surrounding the upcoming Russian elections.
Moreover, Alizadeh highlights internal pressures that may have influenced Aliyev's decision-making, citing a perceived threat to his power by elements within the ruling elite. The eruption of unrest in 2020, coupled with demands for military action over Karabakh, underscored the fragility of Aliyev's regime. Seizing upon favorable geopolitical conditions, including the COVID-19 pandemic and shifting alliances in the region, Aliyev orchestrated a decisive military campaign, bolstered by agreements with key stakeholders such as Russia and Turkey.
Looking into the future, Alizadeh predicts minimal upheavals in the political and economic life of Azerbaijan. The country's dependence on oil and gas revenues is expected to continue, supporting its economic trajectory in the face of geopolitical uncertainty. Despite the pre-election theatricality, fundamental shifts remain elusive, leaving the future course of Azerbaijan's development virtually unchanged.
As Azerbaijan overcomes the consequences of its elections, the country is facing a familiar process characterized by entrenched power dynamics and stable economic realities. The consequences of Aliyev's electoral triumph go beyond the ballot box, shaping the contours of governance and development in the coming years.
As Azerbaijan navigates the aftermath of its electoral exercise, the nation confronts a familiar landscape marked by entrenched power dynamics and enduring economic realities. The implications of Aliyev's electoral triumph reverberate beyond the ballot box, shaping the contours of governance and development in the years to come.
Difficult question
-
Will Moscow be able to prevent Yerevan's rapprochement with the West?
-
On July 13, during a meeting with voters in Pennsylvania, a bullet fired from a sniper rifle by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks grazed former President Trump's head, missing his brain by 1-2 centimeters, and injuring his ear.
-
In recent days, there have been reports in the media that a new devaluation will take place in Azerbaijan in the near future. Economist Natig Jafarli believes that a decrease in the high trade and balance of payments balance may lead to a fall in the value of the manat or devaluation in the near future.
-
As tensions simmer between Azerbaijan and Armenia, there are cautious hopes for a lasting peace agreement. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently underscored the importance of such an agreement during a trilateral meeting with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov and Armenian counterparts. Blinken described the potential deal as "long-term, worthy, and opening up extraordinary opportunities" for both countries, the region, and their relations with the United States.
Leave a review