Ukrainian puzzle

The speech delivered by Federal Security Service Director Alexander Bortnikov at the meeting of the Council of Heads of Security and Special Services of CIS member states became one of the harshest and most ideologically charged statements made by Russian security structures in recent months.

The phone call between Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more than another diplomatic exchange between two rival powers. Judging by Moscow’s statements, the Kremlin effectively used the conversation to warn Washington that Russia is preparing to enter a new phase of the war in Ukraine.

When air raid sirens once again echoed across Kyiv on the night of May 24, residents of the Ukrainian capital already sensed this would not be another routine episode in the long cycle of war. For hours, the sky above the city flashed with interceptions of missiles and drones, while Ukrainian Telegram channels circulated images of fires, shattered apartment blocks, and broken windows in museums and libraries. For many Ukrainians, the night became a symbol of how the conflict is evolving from a battle between armies into a war of societal exhaustion.

In the marble halls of Ashgabat, the heads of government of the Commonwealth of Independent States once again spoke on Friday about transport corridors, digital transformation, and a shared future. Yet behind the official rhetoric of another CIS Council of Heads of Government meeting lay a far deeper question: can an organization created after the collapse of the Soviet Union preserve political and economic relevance in a world of new conflicts, sanctions, and shifting trade routes?