After selecting the TAP started the company in support of the Nabucco-West

On June 28, 2013 the Shah-Deniz consortium has selected the trans-Adriatic pipeline (TAP) route and on July 1, 2013 EU released statement of the European Energy Commissar Gunter Oettinger saying that “the Nabucco West still remains urgent.” Oettinger pins hopes on development of fields on the Caspian shelf in the future.

Almost the same viewpoint was expressed at the ceremony of announcement of the route in Baku by Gordon Birrell, BP-Azerbaijan President, on Friday. He claimed that Azerbaijan has perspective gas fields and as soon as they discovered the both pipelines will be claimed. He also meant the Nabucco-West.

Two questions arise here: why is BP-Azerbaijan President so sure that several big gas fields will be discovered and the second export route will be needed for transportation of their resources? And the second question what calculations the fact that the Nabucco-West must become a commercially attractive project in 10 years is based on?

By 2023-2025 there will be new infrastructure projects in Europe, including delivery of liquefied gases from North America, different parts of Africa, Near East and, possibly, pipelines from the Mediterranean Sea.

If the pipeline project has not been implemented now with the lobbying of the West, how it can still be urgent when competition will increase by ten times.

From the logical viewpoint, Nabucco project and also its shorter version Nabucco-West remained political projects.

In this context position of BP company is unclear: why did it decide to support political projects? Al Cook, Vice President of BP for Shah-Deniz, said clearly that “there was a big difference in the price of gas and its transportation between TAP and Nabucco West.—0—

Leave a review

Economics

Follow us on social networks

News Line