Russia is directly involved in the destabilization of the situation in Armenia - Georgy Vanyan

***

- Do you think the words of Prime Minister N. Pashinyan about 10% were said deliberately in order to prick Russia, or was he mistaken, showed inexperience and said it by accident? The Kremlin issued a statement on the need to comply with the law and the Constitution in Armenia. Whom does Putin support now: Nikol or the military who opposed the prime minister?

- Nikol Pashinyan is a product of the post-Soviet Armenian political elite. He made his career in the system that was created under three Armenian presidents. The position of the editor of one of the leading opposition newspapers allowed him to learn the bazaar rules, the rules of bullying, the rules for devaluing the power of words and the power of fact. After becoming prime minister, his professional self-confidence began to lead to fatal mistakes.

The use of “Iskander” on the territory of Azerbaijan was stuffed with information by low-level Russian experts during the war. I guess the mention of this type of weapon was accidental, popped out on the tongue. Pashinyan cannot come to terms with the idea that he himself has become the object of harassment, mobbing, and slander. He remains in the position of populism. Perhaps because he sees no other way out.

As an incorrigible romantic, I even dare to suggest that a reference to the poor quality of Russian weapons could become his subconscious justification for casualties among civilians on the territory of Azerbaijan. After all, there were also stuffing that Nikol Pashinyan personally gave the order to bomb.

The entire history of military operations both during the war and after it is shrouded in lies. The information field of Armenia has become a terrorist weapon against citizens who cannot orient themselves in matters of the country's security and their own security.

At present, both Azerbaijan and Turkey retain the status of enemy states; martial law has not been canceled. Reconstruction of the objective picture of the war and the objective picture of the post-war processes is postponed for the future.

Today, not Pashinyan is the guarantor of the security of citizens, but citizens, who protect Pashinyan, defend their right to choose, and they do this not so much by participating in rallies as by not joining the so-called opposition forces. Pashinyan is still subject to blackmail and remains involved in the “hunt for traitors,” but this cannot last long. People are tired of living under the threat, and they are tired of anarchy.

- How will the events in Yerevan affect Arayik Harutyunyan, the leader of the separatist regime?

- Yesterday (Feb 24 - Turan), speaker of  Arayik Harutyunyan made a lengthy statement, with a warning (threat) in the last paragraph about possible bloodshed. I personally believe that everyone who speaks about the threat of a civil war joins the clan of the former, to the idea of ​​Robert Kocharian's return to power. I cannot speak about Arayik Harutyunyan, because now I do not understand what kind of power he has and what duties are entrusted to him. In general, what happens in the process of implementing the Statement of November 9? Is this process going on at all? All sides are silent. Again, as before, from time to time they imitate activities, leaving everything at the mercy of the propaganda of enmity.

- The Kremlin issued a statement on the need to comply with the law and the Constitution in Armenia. Whom does the President Vladimir Putin support now:  Nikol Pashinyan or the military who opposed the Prime Minister   whom runs the Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu?

- The President of Armenia must decide within 3 days whether to sign the dismissal of the Chief of the General Staff or not. The situation itself is anti-constitutional. The Chief of the General Staff has submitted an application for a military coup and is awaiting approval. They are trying to promote this model of seizing power in Armenia.

The Russian Federation declares that it will not interfere in our affairs; and it is true. Why would Putin interfere? In principle, he does not care who will rule Armenia at this stage. Although, based on allied obligations, Russia is obliged to assist Nikol Pashinyan if he applies with a request to support internal stability in the country.

The Russian Federation, represented by its citizens-propagandists, and I can assume that by financial injections, is directly involved in the destabilization of the situation in Armenia. But I repeat once again, Putin does not and cannot have preferences, Putin does not care whether there will be a war, a civil war in Armenia, a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, a war in Karabakh, or not. He will act only in case of the possibility of an unconditional occupation of Armenia appears, and then he will find his henchman for the Armenians.