Both sides filed an appeal against the decision in the case of Ikin Suleymanov. What are they dissatisfied with?

Baku /08.11.23/Turan: The lawyers of Ilkin Suleymanov, accused of kidnapping 11-year-old Narmin Guliyeva in November 2019 in the village of Dondar Gushchu, Tovuz district, and 47 days later, her murder and burning of the body, filed an appeal against the deprivation of their client's freedom for a term of 18 years.

This time, the case of Ilkin Suleymanov is being considered in the Ganja Court of Appeal by a panel of judges consisting of Rafik Jafarov and Salman Huseynov, chaired by Teyub Mukhtarov.

At the trial, which began on August 8, it turned out that Narmin Guliyeva's father Sharif Guliyev, who participated in the trial as the legal heir of the victim, also filed an appeal.

He wants a tougher sentence for Ilkin Suleymanov, so that the court sentences him to life imprisonment. However, he missed the statutory 20-day deadline for filing a complaint. The judge stated that since the time for filing the complaint has expired, the case should be considered by the Ganja Court for Serious Crimes.

Ilkin Suleymanov's brother, Adil Suleymanov, tells about what is happening around Ilkin Suleymanov in the program "A Difficult Question".

According to him, from the very first days they (Ilkin Suleymanov's relatives) presented plenty of facts proving the fabrication of evidence against Ilkin Suleymanov.

"The prosecutor's office failed to provide evidence of his guilt. Moreover, during the trial it became clear that the evidence presented by the investigation was fabricated, serious contradictions were discovered. Nevertheless, the Serious Crimes Court did not take into account witness testimony in its verdict, a lot of details pointing to the falsification of evidence," he said.

Adil Suleymanov claims that most of the significant testimony was not included in the verdict.

"Although by law they should have been included in the court's decision, and the court should have given them an assessment. I think the court hid these testimonies," he said, adding that a lot of witness testimony was included in the verdict in a distorted form.

According to him, many important materials contained in the investigation documents were not even investigated.

He also noted that most of the defense petitions were not satisfied, and those that were satisfied were not executed by the court.—0-