Baku Mayor Office can not answer why it changes kiosks

Preparatory hearing on the lawsuit  of Turan News Agency against the Baku Mayor Office took place on  Monday in the  Baku Administrative Economic Court N1.

The suit was filed in accordance with Article 24.1 of the law "On Freedom of Information" for refusing by the mayor Hajibala Abutalibov to provide information related to the installation of new kiosks in the capital.

A letter dated August 28 sent to Abutalibov requested to answer questions about the legal and regulatory side of installation of new stalls, on their legal owner, on the reason why they are used for other purposes, and on causing damage to print media.

At the trial chaired by the judge Vusala Bakhishova, representative of the Department of Trade and Services of the Mayor Office could not answer the questions posed in the letter.

Moreover, the  instruction of the Executive power N 521 of October 28, 2011  submitted to the court, showed the illegality  of  replacing  the kiosks  belonging to the GASID distribution company.

The full pathos letter explains the need to replace the old stalls because they  do not  meet the "new aesthetic requirements of the City" and the need to meet the public demand in the media.

The  instruction does not note the  name of GASID  company that sells periodicals from the 30's of the last century, and the emphasis is made not on improving the sales of newspapers and magazines,  but on the aesthetic and the commercial side of the case.

Monitoring conducted by journalists, show that  in the new kiosks the  selling newspapers  is artificially limited, especially the independent and opposition newspapers. Some kiosks  do not sell periodicals  at all,  but actively sell  beverages and cigarettes. All this has led to a decrease in circulation of newspapers.

After hearing the parties, the judge Bakhishova  called on the Mayor Office  to give answer to the  questions from  Turan agency at the next trial, scheduled for 14 December. Rights of the plaintiff in the court upholds the Institute of Media Rights.—0—

 

Leave a review

Social

Follow us on social networks

News Line