Baku/25.09.23/Reuters:The number of Armenians leaving Karabakh for Armenia reaches 5 thousand. According to Armenian media reports, as of 12:00 on September 25, approximately 4,850 Armenians have left Karabakh for the Republic of Armenia. Images of extensive traffic jams on the route to Armenia have circulated on social media.
Amid this exodus, irredentist voices have called upon local residents not to panic and to avoid creating road congestion, which could hinder the evacuation of the wounded.
It is noteworthy that the process of Armenians leaving Karabakh is not anticipated to have a specific time limit, allowing anyone who wishes to depart the region to do so.
The Azerbaijani side has proposed the reintegration of Karabakh Armenians, but the mass migration of Karabakh Armenians from the region continues at a rapid pace. This raises questions about how this complex issue should be addressed.
Political commentator Rauf Mirkadyrov has shared his insights on the matter in the program "Difficult Question." According to Mirkadyrov, there are two potential approaches in the current situation.
"The first option is that very few Armenians will remain in Karabakh. While reports suggest there are around 120,000 Armenians residing in Karabakh, it is widely acknowledged that the actual number is significantly lower. Many will leave Karabakh en masse, and only a small fraction may choose to stay, likely with the assistance of Russia, which is interested in maintaining a minimal Armenian presence in the region. Without Armenians, the region's strategic significance diminishes," Mirkadyrov stated. However, he emphasized that this is the less desirable option, as current developments may serve the interests of various parties but could potentially be exploited against Azerbaijan in the future.
The second option, which Mirkadyrov believes Azerbaijan should pursue, involves preventing, to the extent possible, the departure of Armenians from Karabakh. This, however, cannot be achieved through coercion. To stem the exodus, Armenians should be alleviated of their fears, and conducive conditions should be established for them. Both the government and the public share the responsibility in this regard. This approach is particularly crucial if there is a genuine desire for Azerbaijanis to return to Zangezur, a historically significant region.
Difficult question
-
In recent developments that highlight the fraught nature of American politics, the Trump administration’s scrutinizing gaze has fallen upon the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), a key player in the global outreach efforts of the U.S. government. This move has stirred a discourse that spans beyond U.S. borders, roping in responses from Azerbaijani pro-government media and eliciting comments from local political figures like Natig Jafarli, chairman of the REAL Party in Azerbaijan.
-
The municipal elections in Azerbaijan, held on January 29, took place without significant public interest or pre-election activity, according to an election law expert. Official data from the Central Election Commission (CEC) reported a voter turnout of 31.45%, but independent observers have cast doubt on this figure.
-
The absence of Azerbaijan's delegation at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) winter session has sparked questions about the country’s participation in the European institution. According to sources in Azerbaijan's parliament, PACE did not send an official invitation to Azerbaijan, as participation requires such an invitation to be issued.
-
Azerbaijani pro-government media have unleashed an unexpected wave of anti-Russian rhetoric, including claims of espionage at the "Russian House" and accusations that the opposition National Council has ties with Moscow. Chairman of the National Council of Democratic Forces Jamil Hasanli dismissed the allegations as baseless, describing them as part of a smear campaign by the government to shift attention from its own close ties with the Kremlin.
Leave a review