© Photo : European Union ©Philippe Samyn and Partners architects and engineers - lead and design Partner Studio Valle Progettazioni architects Buro Happold engineers ©Colour compositions by Georges Meurant
On August 31, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held their fourth meeting in Brussels through the mediation of European Council President Charles Michel.
Michel's statement following the four-hour meeting did not demonstrate any progress in the negotiation process since the last meeting in May of this year. Like last time, Michel named four directions for bringing Azerbaijan and Armenia to a comprehensive peace:
Peaceful agreement
Humanitarian issues
Border issues
Communications
It is difficult to agree with Michel's assessment of the steps taken by the parties over the past three months after the meeting: "It is gratifying to see that many steps have been taken to advance the agreements reached during our last meeting."
A comparative analysis of the tasks announced at the May meeting in all four areas and the tasks set on August 31 for the future until the next November meeting, creates the impression of insignificant progress that is not consistent with the EU's ambitions.
No any real results have been achieved in the four areas, and bilateral relations are devoid of intensity of a consultative nature.
Azerbaijan had to resolve the issue on communications, which is not of first importance, almost with the use of force three weeks before the Brussels meeting, when on August 3 the army carried out the Retribution operation, which resulted with the return of the Lachin region, the closure of the Khankendi-Armenia border road and the opening an alternative road, dictated by official Baku. These events once again showed Armenia's desire to drag out the process of stabilizing Armenian-Azerbaijani relations. Exactly the same situation is in the other three areas of the agenda of the peace process.
The Armenian society still hopes for some kind of geopolitical cataclysm, which may favor Armenia in changing the balance of power in the Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and returning the strategic initiative to Yerevan. In this context, it is unlikely that visible progress will be made before the next meeting in Brussels for achieving a comprehensive peace.
Europe
-
On December 19, the European Parliament adopted a resolution addressing the repressions against civil society and independent media in Azerbaijan. The resolution stated that since 2023, the Azerbaijani government has systematically pressured civil society, political opposition, human rights defenders, the LGBTI+ community, and independent media, with these pressures intensifying ahead of the COP29 summit.
-
The export trunk gas pipeline Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod has recently garnered heightened global attention. This is not due to its rank among the top five longest pipelines in the world (spanning 4,451 km) but because it is the last operational pipeline through which Russia delivers gas to Europe. Its operation could cease on January 1, 2025.
-
As the potential halt to Russian gas transit through Ukraine approaches—scheduled for 5 a.m. Ukrainian time on January 1, 2025—effectively signaling the cessation of pipeline gas supplies from Russia to major EU economies in Central and Western Europe, EU nations and the newly updated European Commission (EC) leadership have intensified consultations on ensuring Europe's energy security.
-
The meeting of the newly elected Secretary General Mark Rutte with President Erdoğan in Ankara on November 25 was aimed not so much at familiarizing himself with the member countries but at holding direct discussions about ongoing developments in the region. This is understandable, as the closer the date for Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House approaches, the more intense the situation on the Russia-Ukraine front becomes. On the other hand, despite the latest reconciliation between Israel and Lebanon, questions surrounding Gaza’s future are growing in number.
Leave a review