A conversation about the intellectual and the masses...

Bakı/16.08.23/Turan:  The recent bestowal of the "Order of Istiglal" (Independence) upon Rasim Balayev, a renowned figure in the Azerbaijani arts scene, and the presentation of the "Order of Shohrat" (Glory) to Akif Islamzade by President Ilham Aliyev has triggered a nuanced response among denizens of social media. Online users have expressed mixed feelings and criticism towards the recipients of these honors.

Particularly contentious has been Rasim Balayev's reception of the presidential accolade, compounded by the association drawn between President Aliyev and a historical icon, Babek, a central figure in the national liberation movement of the early Middle Ages—an emblematic role that Balayev once portrayed in an epic cinematic production. Adding fuel to the digital fire, Balayev's interview with Air Force-Azerbaijan drew further ire, as he labeled those criticizing him as a "mass."--0--

Critics of Balayev have decried his use of the term "mass," contending that it is an incongruous choice for someone held in intellectual esteem. Mehriban Vezir, a writer and public commentator, delved into this issue on the program "Difficult Question." She highlighted the pressing need to delineate the essence of an intellectual, asserting that not every educated and prominent individual can lay claim to this title. Rather, an intellectual is characterized by a breadth of knowledge, a discerning appreciation of the arts, critical thinking acumen, and an unyielding commitment to rectifying injustices.

Vezir went on to examine Rasim Balayev's profile within this framework, acknowledging his eminence as an artist and public figure. Through the vicissitudes of the Soviet era, the transitional period, and the era of independence, Balayev has endured and remained visible. His words have often underscored the limits of his role, as he candidly stated, "I portrayed Babek and Nasimi, but I am neither Babek nor Nasimi. I am Rasim." This distinction, Vezir argued, elucidates Balayev's stance as a gifted actor, rather than an instrumental agent of societal aspirations—a role model emblematic of his portrayals.

In Vezir's estimation, society has been unjust in its treatment of Rasim Balayev. The writer contended that Balayev's actions thus far have not warranted reproach for betraying public expectations. Unlike figures who champion causes and speak at rallies, Balayev has maintained a distinct distance from such roles. It appears that Balayev's remarkable portrayal of heroic historical figures like Babek, Nasimi, and Beyrek may have, in a way, blurred the lines between his on-screen and off-screen personas, leading to public misconceptions and unfounded disappointments.

Mehriban Vezir's perspective contends that, until now, Rasim Balayev has not taken actions that would justify the level of disappointment expressed. In a nuanced analysis, Vezir suggests that Balayev's portrayal of iconic figures may have inadvertently engendered expectations that exceed his real-life role and responsibilities, resulting in an unfounded disillusionment among the populace.